Inequity of NIH cancer funding in the United States: an ecological study predicting funding based on disease burden from 2008 through 2023Research in context

Inequity of NIH cancer funding in the United States: an ecological study predicting funding based on disease burden from 2008 through 2023Research in context

Blog Article

Summary: Background: Disease burden has been used to predict National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding but included diseases with little underlying relationship.Here we focus on cancers dragon ball lg disney to create a more appropriate model to allow for more targeted scrutinization of funding allocation.Methods: An ecological study using NIH funding data (2008–2023) was performed.Inclusion of cancers was based on their presence in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool and the 2021 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study.

Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) were collected and to evaluate the impact of public interest, Google Trends data was used.Multivariable linear regression determined appropriate funding based on disease burden and public interest.To quantify how each cancer’s funding differed from model predictions residual values were used to calculate the percent over/under funding.Findings: Fifteen cancers met inclusion criteria.

Neuroblastoma had the greatest ratio of funding to DALYs per 100,000 people (US$14,000,000) while lung cancer had the lowest (US$300,000).Stomach cancer was the most underfunded (197.9% [95% CI: 136.0%, 276.

2%]) while brain cancer was the most overfunded (64.1% [95% CI: 53.8%, 72.1%]).

Even at their lowest funding values in the study period brain, breast, and colorectal cancer all had greater than 40% overfunding.Contrarily, the lowest annual funding for leukemia, uterine, and stomach cancer received less than 150% of expected funding.Despite its overfunding brain read more cancer had an increase in DALYs in the study period.Interpretation: Modeling by disease category demonstrated disparities in funding indicating the need for reevaluation for possible funding inequities.

The year-by-year approach taken in this study will drive the ability for future research to better understand NIH funding decisions.Additionally, the role of public interest in research funding needs to be further evaluated to ensure that popularity does not override disease burden, in funding decisions.Funding: No Funding.